Keywords
Theme:
soil survey, soils, Soil Survey Geographic, SSURGO
Place:
Wisconsin, Trempealeau, Rossman Creek Quadrangle, Strum Quadrangle, Strum SE Quadrangle, Osseo Quadrangle, Lookout Quadrangle, Elk Creek Quadrangle, Pleasantville Quadrangle, Pigeon Falls Quadrangle, Swinns Valley Quadrangle, Indepependence Quadrangle, Whitehall Quadrangle, Blair Quadrangle, Dodge Quadrangle, Tamarack Quadrangle, Ettrick Quadrangle, Hegg Quadrangle, Winona East Quadrangle, Trempealeau Quadrangle, Galesville Quadrangle, Stevenstown Quadrangle, Pickwick Quadrangle, Holmen Quadrangle
Description
Abstract
This data set is a digital soil survey and generally is the most
detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National
Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing
maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base
and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely
sensed and other information.
This data set consists of georeferenced digital map data and
computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area
extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory
of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a repeatable
pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at
the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line
features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features
too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large
enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and
management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the
National Soil Information System relational database, which gives
the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.
Purpose
SSURGO depicts information about the kinds and distribution of
soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO
product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Supplementary Information
Digital versions of hydrography, cultural features, and other
associated layers that are not part of the SSURGO data set may be
available from the primary organization listed in the Point of
Contact.
_________________
Status of the data
Complete
Data update frequency:
As needed
Time period for which the data is relevant
Beginning date and time:
20040220
Ending date and time:
20061205
Description:
publication date
Publication Information
Who created the data: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Date and time:
20061205
Publisher and place:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, Fort Worth, Texas
_________________
Data storage and access information
File name: TrempCo_MasterDATA.DBO.Tremp_Co_Soils_Polygon
Type of data: vector digital data
Location of the data:
URL:http://SoilDataMart.nrcs.usda.gov/
Data processing environment: Microsoft Windows XP Version 5.1 (Build 2600) Service Pack 2; ESRI ArcCatalog 9.2.2.1350
Accessing the data
Data format: ArcView shapefile
Data transfer size: 56.7 MB
How to decompress the file: WinZip or equivalent
Network location:
URL:http://SoilDataMart.nrcs.usda.gov/
Access instructions: Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email
address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via
anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request
at Web site and receipt of email message.
Accessing the data
Data format: ARC/INFO coverage
Data transfer size: 56.7 MB
How to decompress the file: WinZip or equivalent
Network location:
URL:http://SoilDataMart.nrcs.usda.gov/
Access instructions: Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email
address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via
anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request
at Web site and receipt of email message.
Accessing the data
Data format: ARC/INFO interchange file
Data transfer size: 56.7 MB
How to decompress the file: WinZip or equivalent
Network location:
URL:http://SoilDataMart.nrcs.usda.gov/
Access instructions: Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email
address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via
anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request
at Web site and receipt of email message.
Accessing the data
Data format: ASCII
Data transfer size: 14.3 MB
How to decompress the file: WinZip or equivalent
Network location:
URL:http://SoilDataMart.nrcs.usda.gov/
Access instructions: Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email
address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via
anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request
at Web site and receipt of email message.
Constraints on accessing and using the data
Access constraints:
None
Use constraints:
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, should be acknowledged as the data source in products
derived from these data.
This data set is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool
in permitting or citing decisions, but may be used as a reference
source. This is public information and may be interpreted by
organizations, agencies, units of government, or others based on
needs; however, they are responsible for the appropriate
application. Federal, State, or local regulatory bodies are not to
reassign to the Natural Resources Conservation Service any
authority for the decisions that they make. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these maps
for purposes related solely to State or local regulatory programs.
Photographic or digital enlargement of these maps to scales greater
than at which they were originally mapped can cause misinterpretation
of the data. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The
depicted soil boundaries, interpretations, and analysis derived from
them do not eliminate the need for onsite sampling, testing, and
detailed study of specific sites for intensive uses. Thus, these data
and their interpretations are intended for planning purposes only.
Digital data files are periodically updated. Files are dated, and
users are responsible for obtaining the latest version of the data.
Details about this document
Contents last updated: 20070926
at time 16075400
Who completed this document
REQUIRED: The person responsible for the metadata information.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
mailing address:
8030 Excelsior Drive, Suite 200
Madison, WI 53717
608-662-4422 ext 275 (voice)
608-662-4429 (fax)
don.fehrenbacher@wi.usda.gov
Standards used to create this document
Standard name: Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Standard version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Time convention used in this document: local time
Metadata profiles defining additonal information
ESRI Metadata Profile: http://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html
Horizontal coordinate system
Projected coordinate system name: NAD_1983_HARN_WISCRS_Trempealeau_County_Feet
Geographic coordinate system name: GCS_North_American_1983_HARN
Details
Map Projection Name: Transverse Mercator
Scale Factor at Central Meridian: 1.000036
Longitude of Central Meridian: -91.366667
Latitude of Projection Origin: 43.161111
False Easting: 843000.000000
False Northing: 0.013000
Planar Coordinate Information
Planar Distance Units: meters
Coordinate Encoding Method: coordinate pair
Coordinate Representation
Abscissa Resolution: 0.000128
Ordinate Resolution: 0.000128
Geodetic Model
Horizontal Datum Name: North American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid Name: Geodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major Axis: 6378137.000000
Denominator of Flattening Ratio: 298.257222
Altitude System Definition
Resolution: 1.000000
Encoding Method: Explicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates
_________________
Bounding coordinates
Horizontal
In decimal degrees
West:
-91.6172
East:
-91.1356
North:
44.6032
South:
43.9802
In projected or local coordinates
Left: 778406.146397
Right: 899439.499146
Top: 523529.688005
Bottom: 300026.506076
_________________
Lineage
FGDC lineage
Process step 1
Process description: Trempealeau County had a previously published soil
survey, 1977, at 1:15840 scale. An evaluation was made of the soil
survey in 2003. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations
and map unit components were accurate.
Source used: SCS1
Process date: 2003
Process step 2
Process description: Soil delineations and special soil features were
compiled using an automated compilation process at the U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Digitizing
Unit, Madison, Wisconsin (WIDU). The following is a list of the
materials required for the automated compilation OrthoMapper TM
process: digital contact prints with fiducials, 30 meter Digital
Elevation Models (DEMs),digital 3.75 minute orthophotographs (DOQs),
publication film positive composites and publication atlas sheet
photographic overlays, and soil delineation overlays. The photographic
overlays and soil delineation overlays were scanned at the WIDU at a
400 DPI resolution. Approximately twenty ground control points were
taken between the DOQs and contact prints using image identifiable
physical features. Based on these control points, and using DEMs for
the z-value, the contact prints were orthorectified using OrthoMapper
with a Root Mean Square error (RMS) of 2.0 or less. Each newly
orthorectified contact print was visually verified against existing DOQs
using a flickering process in OrthoMapper. Once the accuracy of the
orthorectification of the contact prints was verified, twelve to fifteen
ground control points were taken linking the photographic overlays to
the contact prints. The soil delineation overlays were linked to the
photographic overlays with scanned tic marks and were orthorectified
using OrthoMapper with a RMS tolerance of 0.5 or less. The
orthorectified soil delineation overlays were internally edge matched,
and merged together using LT4X Version 4.1.1., and LT2000. The county
border was also imported at this time. Soils and special soil features
were labeled on screen using the othorectified publication film positive
composite in LT4X Version 4.1.1 at a resolution of at least 0.01 inch. A
100 percent pen plot review of the soils and special soil features was
done of by the cartographic staff at the WIDU. A ten percent quality
assurance review was done of the soils and special soil features by a
senior soil scientist at the Major Land Resource Office in St. Paul,
Minnesota. The soil and special soil features data were then exported
as Digital Line Graph-3 Optional Format files (DLGs) in LT4X and LT2000.
Source used: SCS1, NRCS1, NRCS2, NRCS3, NRCS4,
NRCS5, NRCS6, USGS1
Process date: 2004
Process step 3
Process description: The Digital Line Graph-3 Optional format files(DLGs)
were imported into Arc/Info and evaluated with the October 1998 AML
provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort
Worth, Texas (NCGC). Upon successful completion, the data were merged
into a seamless coverage, and verified against digital
orthophotos by soil scientists. The common boundary for Trempealeau
County was replaced with an exact duplicate copy from Buffalo, Eau
Claire, Jackson and La Crosse Counties, Wisconsin. Quadrangles
affected by this editing include: Rossman Creek, Strum, Strum SE,
Osseo, Lookout, Pigeon Falls, Swinns Valley, Blair, Dodge, Hegg,
Winona East, Trempealeau, Stevenstown, Pickwick and Holmen. The
data were then processed through the 20040211 SSURGO AMLs. Upon
completion of the review, the data were then exported to the Soils
DataMart website.
Source used: USGS1, NRCS7, NRCS8, NRCS9, NRCS10,
NRCS11
Process date: 2004
Process step 4
Process description: The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source used: NASIS
Process date: 20040315
Process step 5
Process description: The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source used: NASIS
Process date: 20040315
Process step 6
Process description: The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined that the tabular data should be released for official use. A selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source used: NASIS
Process date: 20060120
Process step 7
Process description: The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse.
TAM-Component landform was added for those major or minor hydric components where it was missing and the RV? field was edited to "yes" for all hydric components in the Geomorphic Description table. Minor components were included with this latest submission of tabular data to the SDW. This was done to meet the requirements for a generated National Hydric Soils List.
The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source used: NASIS
Process date: 20060123
Process step 8
Process description: The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source used: NASIS
Process date: 20061204
Process step 9
Process description: The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change. The tabular data was updated in accordance with National Bulletin 430-5-7 dated August 25, 2005. Legend data elements which may have been populated or edited include, legend status and legend area overlaps. Legend correlation and other notes are included in this export. Component data which may have been populated or edited include component names, local phases, MAAT, MAP, frost free days, percentage, kind, slope, drainage class, parent material, classification, geomorphic description, morphometry, aspect, T, WEI, WEG, hydrologic group, flooding and ponding duration and frequency, moisture status, hydric interpretation, restrictions and component text. Horizon data which may have been populated or edited include designation, depth, texture, structure, rock fragments, sand separates, total sand, total silt, total clay, organic matter, Ksat, Kw, Kf, pH, albedo dry, LEP, bulk density; water content, hydraulic conductivity, liquid limit, plasticity index, calcium carbonate, CEC-7 and ECEC. Interpretations for the Department of Homeland Security and the military were also added to this tabular version. All minor components are included.
Source used: NASIS
Process date: 20061205
Process step 10
Process description: The tabular data were extracted from the data mart without change. The spatial data's coordinate system was transformed to UTM Zone 15, Northern Hemisphere (NAD 83) using ESRI ArcObjects 8.3 "ConvertFeatureClass" and exported to an ESRI shapefile.
Source used: NASIS
Process date: 20070131
Process step 11
Process description: Metadata imported.
Source used: Z:\X_Drive_rework\Soils\Trempealeau\soil_metadata_wi121.xml
Sources
Source 1:
Soil Survey of Trempealeau County, Wisconsin
(SCS1)
Media: paper
Scale denominator: 15840
Contribution: source of map unit delineations and soil
and special soil feature labels
Currentness of this source
Source 2:
publication atlas sheet photographic overlay
(NRCS1)
Media: film
Scale denominator: 15840
Contribution: source of control points
Currentness of this source
Source 3:
composite overlays
(NRCS2)
Media: stable-based material
Scale denominator: 15840
Contribution: source of special soil features and
soil attribute data
Currentness of this source
Source 4:
soil delineation overlays
(NRCS3)
Media: stable-based material
Scale denominator: 15840
Contribution: source of soil delineations for scanning
Currentness of this source
Source 5:
multiple 3.75 minute digital orthophoto quadrangles (DOQs)
(USGS1)
Media: CD-ROM
Scale denominator: 12000
Contribution: source of ground control points and water and
selected land use changes.
Currentness of this source
Beginning date and time:
1992
Ending date and time:
1999
Source 6:
multiple digital aerial photographs (contact prints)
(NRCS4)
Media: CD-ROM
Scale denominator: 43650
Contribution: source for ground control points
Currentness of this source
Source 7:
30 meter Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) National Elevation
Dataset
(NRCS5)
Media: online
Scale denominator: 24000
Contribution: source for orthorectification process
Currentness of this source
Source 8:
Digital Raster Graphic County Mosaic
(NRCS6)
Media: online
Scale denominator: 24000
Contribution: source for county borders
Currentness of this source
Source 9:
Soil and special soil feature Digital Line Graph-3
optional format files
(NRCS7)
Media: digital
Scale denominator: 15840
Contribution: SSURGO Review source
Currentness of this source
Source 10:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Buffalo
County, Wisconsin
(NRCS8)
Media: online
Scale denominator: 12000
Contribution: common boundary source
Currentness of this source
Source 11:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Eau Claire
County, Wisconsin
(NRCS9)
Media: online
Scale denominator: 15840
Contribution: common boundary source
Currentness of this source
Source 12:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Jackson
County, Wisconsin
(NRCS10)
Media: online
Scale denominator: 12000
Contribution: common boundary source
Currentness of this source
Source 13:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for La Crosse
County, Wisconsin
(NRCS11)
Media: online
Scale denominator: 12000
Contribution: common boundary source
Currentness of this source
Source 14:
National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
(NASIS)
Media: database
Contribution: attribute (tabular) information
Currentness of this source
Beginning date and time:
2004
Ending date and time:
2004
_________________
Spatial data quality
Horizontal positional accuracy
The accuracy of these digital data is based upon their
compilation to base maps that meet National Map
Accuracy Standards at a scale of 1 inch equals 1,000
feet. The difference in positional accuracy between the
soil boundaries and special soil features locations in the
field and their digitized map locations is unknown. The
locational accuracy of soil delineations on the ground varies
with the transition between map units.
For example, on long gently sloping landscapes the transition
occurs gradually over many feet. Where landscapes change
abruptly from steep to level, the transition will be very
narrow. Soil delineation boundaries and special soil features
generally were digitized within 0.01 inch of their locations on
the digitizing source. The digital map elements are edge matched
between data sets. The data along each quadrangle edge are
matched against the data for the adjacent quadrangle. Edge
locations generally do not deviate from centerline to centerline
by more than 0.01 inch.
_________________
Spatial data description
Vector data information
ESRI description
TrempCo_MasterDATA.DBO.Tremp_Co_Soils_Polygon
ESRI feature type: Simple
Geometry type: Polygon
Topology: FALSE
Feature count: 32370
Spatial Index: TRUE
Linear referencing: FALSE
SDTS description
Feature class: SDTS feature type, feature count
TrempCo_MasterDATA.DBO.Tremp_Co_Soils_Polygon:
G-polygon, 32370